Voici le compte rendu hebdomadaire du forum de la Harvard Law School sur la gouvernance corporative au 5 janvier 2017.
Bonne lecture !
- Are Directors Really Irrelevant to Capital Structure Choice?
- 2017 Board Priorities Report
- The Life (and Death?) of Corporate Waste
- Progress in Understanding Proxy Access and the Shareholder Proposal Process
- Rethinking Compensation Philosophies: Top 5 Questions for Boards
- Controlling Stockholder M&A Does Not Automatically Trigger Entire Fairness Review
- Are Shareholder Votes Rigged?
- Jury Verdict in “Spread Bet” Insider Trading Case: A Reminder of U.S. Long-Arm Regulatory Risk
- REIT M&A, Governance and Activism—Themes for 2017
- Activism, Strategic Trading, and Liquidity
- The Delaware General Corporation Law, Simplified
- Gender Parity on Boards Around the World
Classé dans :Actionnaires activistes, Comportement, Diversité, Droits des actionnaires, Formation des administrateurs, Formation en gouvernance, Gouvernance, Indépendance des administrateurs, Management (Haute direction), Performance, Performance, Règlementation en gouvernance, Rémunération de la direction, Relève, Stratégie Tagged: Actionnaire, Board of directors, Comportements, composition, Corporate governance, Direction, Diversité, formation, independance, Performance, Réglementation, rémunération, relève, Stratégies
