Voici le compte rendu hebdomadaire du forum de la Harvard Law School sur la gouvernance corporative au 25 mai 2017.
J’ai relevé les principaux billets.
Bonne lecture !
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
- Do Exogenous Changes in Passive Institutional Ownership Affect Corporate Governance and Firm Value?
- It Pays to Write Well
- Mutual Fund Companies Have Significant Power to Increase Corporate Transparency
- Just How Preferred is Your Preferred?
- Private Investor Meetings in Public Firms: The Case for Increasing Transparency
- Court of Chancery’s Guidance on “Credible Basis” Standard for Obtaining Books
- Recent Board Declassifications: A Response to Cremers and Sepe
- SEC Enforcement Actions Against Public Companies and Subsidiaries Keep Pace
- Dual-Class Stock and Private Ordering: A System That Works
- 2017 IPO Report
Classé dans :Actionnaires activistes, Comportement, Diversité, Droits des actionnaires, Formation des administrateurs, Formation en gouvernance, Gouvernance, Indépendance des administrateurs, Management (Haute direction), Performance, Performance, Règlementation en gouvernance, Rémunération de la direction, Relève, Stratégie Tagged: Actionnaire, Board of directors, Comportements, composition, Corporate governance, Direction, Diversité, formation, independance, Performance, Réglementation, rémunération, relève, Stratégies Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
