Voici le compte rendu hebdomadaire du forum de la Harvard Law School sur la gouvernance corporative au 24 août 2017.
J’ai relevé les principaux billets, tout en me limitant au Top 10.
Bonne lecture !
- Regulating Motivation: A New Perspective on the Volcker Rule
- Information Asymmetries Conceal Fraud and Systemic Risks in the U.S. Banking Industry
- Private Equity and Financial Fragility During the Crisis
- Activist Investors’ Approaches to Targeting Boards
- 2017 Securities and M&A Litigation Mid-Year Review
- Governance through Shame and Aspiration: Index Creation and Corporate Behavior in Japan
- ISS Releases Surveys for 2018 Policy Updates
- The Era of Private Ordering for Corporate Governance
- Delaware Court of Chancery Extends Business Judgment Rule
- Board Oversight of Long-Term Value Creation and Preservation
Classé dans :Actionnaires activistes, Comportement, Diversité, Droits des actionnaires, Formation des administrateurs, Formation en gouvernance, Gouvernance, Indépendance des administrateurs, Management (Haute direction), Performance, Performance, Règlementation en gouvernance, Rémunération de la direction, Relève, Stratégie Tagged: Actionnaire, Board of directors, Comportements, composition, Corporate governance, Direction, Diversité, formation, independance, Performance, Réglementation, rémunération, relève, Stratégies
